On July 29, Labour announced it would abandon plans to cap social care costs, a policy aimed at limiting how much individuals would pay for care over their lifetime. Initially introduced by the Conservative/Lib Dem coalition in 2014, the policy faced numerous delays and was excluded from Labour's 2024 manifesto. With a significant budget shortfall, the new government decided against the cap, which was set to cost £1 billion in 2025/26.
The cap was intended to address a key issue in England’s social care system: means testing. Unlike the NHS, social care is not free and is based on an individual's financial situation. Many people must use their savings or sell their homes to afford care, especially for long-term conditions like dementia. The cap would have limited these expenses, providing state support after a certain threshold.
Labour’s scrapped policy would have made the means test more generous and set a maximum limit on what individuals pay for care in their lifetime. Despite not being as comprehensive as NHS coverage, it would have reduced the financial burden on many families. However, the policy was not universally welcomed and lacked full endorsement even within Labour.
The decision to drop the cap leaves the government with no clear plan for social care reform. While a cross-party royal commission has been suggested, this could delay meaningful action for years. In the meantime, the current system remains inadequate, with many people unable to access the care they need.
Urgent reforms are needed to create a fairer system where more people can receive state-funded support. Without swift action, the cycle of uncertainty will continue, leaving families to struggle with the high costs of care and a system that fails to meet the needs of a growing population.
For more details, read the full analysis on The King’s Fund
Kommentare